Songs mean a lot, when songs are bought, and so are you.*

I took exactly one photo at BlogHer this year. Ladies and Gentlemen, without further ado, here is that photo (PREPARE TO BE DAZZLED!):

6a00e550896a818833011571498d21970c1 Songs mean a lot, when songs are bought, and so are you.*

This was an envelope left to us by the fabulous Cake Girls, makers of The Unicorn Cake To End All Unicorn Cakes. And yes, I so totally LOLed when I read what was written on it.

I spent most of this year’s BlogHer in three states of being: 1) Total Panic, 2) Exhausted/Hungover, 3) Social Overload. It’s a tidy, but fairly accurate summary. Everything else pretty much went by the book: I cried, as I predicted I would, when I finally met Kate from Sweet|Salty (my emotional state wasn’t helped by the fact that Kristin from Better Now was right there with her — these are two women who I adore both as writers and human beings in ways that are inarticulable and there they were, before me suddenly, all pretty and good-smelling and stuff — I’M NOT MADE OF STONE, DAMMIT). Similarly, I teared up at several points hanging out with the writers of MamaPop, who I consider to be brothers and sisters in my chosen family, and who are each in their own way endless sources of real joy for me. Finally, as anticipated, by Saturday night I’d reached Maximum Density with regard to my capacity for real-life socializing, and rapidly retreated back into the lush, tropical introversion that is my natural habitat (I know, you don’t believe that, right? But it’s true. I only play an extrovert on the interwebs. Unlike some people we know and love).

But all that to-be-expected crap aside, here’s what I want to say: making money as a blogger, and having blogging as your business, is not the same thing as selling out.

What I mean to say is that beneath the recent finger-wagging and tsk-tsking about swag-hungry conference attendees and bloggers whose seals of approval are purchased for samples of laundry detergent (or, alternately, new washers/dryers, as the scale here really isn’t the point), lies that same anxiety we’ve been grappling with since Heather Armstrong (most prominently in our community) put up her first Google ad, boiled down to its bluntest essence. Who’s real and who’s putting on? Who’s a “writer” and who’s just cranking out filler content? Who genuinely cares about the community and who is playing it, leveraging unearned cache and relevance for the basest, most self-serving of motives? Who would be here if there was no money, no free trips, no free crap? Who’s a product/sample whore and who’s Blogging With Integrity? Who’s one of us, and who’s one of Those People?

On the one hand, this topic kind of bores me to tears. On the other hand, it just doesn’t seem to go away, so there must be some important There there.

I remember the first BlogHer, which was in both spirit and practice more aligned with a Star Trek convention than a gathering of Influential Tastemakers. But then this was, of course, before the money came in. By the next year everything had changed: there was a new tension and competitiveness, and a clear if not openly verbalized hierarchical power structure solidified that shifted relationships and pushed some people apart while drawing others together. Which, ehh, not to get all Marx/Engels Reader on you or anything, but within a society based in capitalism this is kind of par for the course — the whole social stratifying thing. I’m not condoning it by any stretch of the imagination, I’m just saying that when you push large sums of money at a bunch of glorified monkeys you shouldn’t be surprised when shit starts getting lobbed about and, at least in some but certainly not all instances, gums up the works of said monkey’s typewriters, crappifying the resultant prose. Stupid monkeys.

Wait, what was I saying?

I guess I’m kind of just plain out of enthusiasm for the Us vs. Them mentality. I’m tired of division, segmentation, of the whole Those People idea. Because elbowing a baby in the face to get to some free shit has nothing to do with whether a person is Blogging With Integrity or not — it’s just plain old run-of-the-mill, garden-variety douchebaggery and bad manners. Ridiculous, asinine, horrible people can be found in all spheres and walks of life, and it just so happens that now some of them are blogging. And this surprises us how, exactly?

The profound generalized contempt expressed regarding the highly visible swag giveaways of this year’s BlogHer seems to me to be expressive of two things: 1) a failure to understand that crapheads with bad manners will find ways to express their doucheyness whether free flash drives are offered to them or not, and 2) the persistence of that old, lingering discomfort relative to the idea that commerce, art/craft, and integrity can all coexist peacefully without one necessarily suffering to accommodate the other. That you can be an entrepreneur or businessperson in this realm, yet not be a “sell-out.” That one could happily accumulate swag, make money, and take advantage of free goods and services offered to them without compromising their principles and integrity, or without diluting and diminishing the bite of their prose, the power of their individual voice and vision. It seems there’s some part of us that goes on worrying that idea, turning it over and over again in our minds, long after we say we’re SO TOTALLY FINE WITH IT, NO REALLY. We say that, and yet it seems as though we can’t quite dispel the notion that money and corruption are inextricably linked, and that somehow, some way, the Making Money From Something You Love bit diminishes and taints the thing you love, or the love itself even.

I’m a business owner. MamaPop is many, many things — it is my internet home, my labor of love, my greatest professional source of joy and satisfaction, my social sphere, the place where some of the people I care about most in the world spend their time. But indeed, it is also a business. If MamaPop were a physical place of business, I’d be one of those people who’d go into work at 5am and fall asleep at my desk every night, not because I’m a self-flagellating workaholic but because I truly, truly love and adore what I do, and all of the people involved in it. When I speak of the site, and in particular of the people who write for it, I often tear up like a sap, because I feel so incredibly lucky to be working with these brilliant and hugely talented people, and I am ridiculously proud of what we’ve made together, of what we make every day together. I feel an almost maternal affection for and protectiveness over the writers. They are, as I said, family. And yes, I mean that in the most Tony Soprano way possible.

But I also make money from MamaPop. Indeed, it is my primary source of income, and the thing which will likely make or break my ability to remain a full-time blogger in the long run. Its success will determine whether I can make of this blogging thing my life’s work or have to scrap it and get a desk job somewhere, and I’m very much aware of that, even more so in the wake of my separation since I’m now going to have to garner something equivalent to a “real” salary rather than one that’s supplementary to my husband’s. And sure, there’s a sense of pressure and urgency there. Of course there is. But it changes nothing about how I feel about the site, about how I treat the writers, about what I value in them and their work, and my standards relative to the collective sum of MamaPop. The desire to make a living wage, to financially profit from the thing you love to do more than anything else in the world, and to make your life’s work that which you wanted as your profession since you were a child, is hardly a base thing. Isn’t that what we all want, or at least originally wanted? When I was in 6th grade I told my teacher at the time that I was going to be a writer when I grew up. And after all my years in academia, I never really believed that would come to pass. But here I am. I can’t tell you how astounding that is to me, how grateful I am for it, and how much real, incorruptible love I have for what I’m doing every single day. And though I might not be able to adequately articulate it, I think the MamaPop writers know the profundity of what I feel. In fact, I’m absolutely sure they know.

At BlogHer this past weekend, MamaPop threw an amazing party. And here’s a secret I’ll share with you: I didn’t put all of that together to impress and entertain the general BlogHer population — though I’m incredibly glad people had a great time, and that the online community we’re a part of embraced The Joy of Unicorns. The whole time I was planning the party, making arrangements and purchases, I was thinking about the MamaPop writers. That party was for them, and if there’s anyone I wanted to ‘impress,’ it was them. Right before the party Friday night, all of the writers met up at the Chi Bar in the Sheraton, and I handed out some small gifts, and teared up saying a few flailing words about how awesome they are, and about how thankful I am to have each of them in my work-life and in my life-life. And at some point I told them that the whole thing, the party, all of it, was for them, about them, and that I’d just invited 450 of our closest friends to enjoy it with us. That’s how I felt. That, for me, was the truth of it. That was my motivation.

Throwing a party of that scale costs a ridiculous amount of money, and we wouldn’t have been able to do it without some very generous sponsors. But I never for a second felt I could, should, or had to in any way compromise my sense of personal integrity for that funding. I am many things, both good and not-so-good, but if there’s anything I am consistently relative to MamaPop — and I think Amy and Catherine, the two people who’ve worked most closely with me online, would readily attest to this — it would be uncompromising and stubborn as shit (or is that two things? Meh.). I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: I just want to do things MY way, because I’m right, goddammit (AND YOU WILL BOW DOWN BEFORE ME!!! (kidding)). I’m kind of an asshole like that, but pointedly so. Lucky for me, the sponsors we had for our party were INFINITELY laid back, and put an enormous amount of trust in me and my judgment, all but saying “Here’s some money, knock yourself out.” I never had to bend over, kiss ass, make promises I didn’t feel comfortable with, or in any other way compromise. Maybe this is unusual, I don’t know. Actually, I kind of don’t want to know. Because this is the standard that’s been set, and as far as I’m concerned if there’s to be a Sparklecorn 2010, sponsors better be prepared to line up, rub my feet, and tell me how pretty I am if they want in on the action. OH I KEED. (Well, sort of.)

Last night, as I was writing this post, I joked on Twitter, “Am working on a post that seems to have no beginning, middle, or end. I’m going all Led Zeppelin on your asses and shit.” And that’s not far from the truth, I know. But if all of this meandering discourse on art and commerce and love and money is intended to articulate anything, it’s the message that bloggers don’t have to sell their souls to be decent business people, don’t have to compromise their sense of personal and professional integrity for sponsorship money, don’t have to participate in or accept intrusive, cheesy product shilling as the price to be paid for corporate dollars. The best companies won’t ask that you exchange your sense of integrity and dignity for the opportunity to throw a kick-ass party. They’ll just want to be a part of the awesomeness you create. And, if you’re as lucky as I was, they’ll get out on the dance floor beside you and shake it to “SexyBack” when the time comes, because no one — not even the most upstanding, composed corporate suit — can resist the charms of Mr. Timberlake.

. . . . .

*For obvious reasons this song has been on my mind these past few days, as I’ve been mulling things over:

Pavement, “Cut Your Hair”

 

  • http://profile.typepad.com/jodiffur jodifur

    My favorite memory from Blogher, that night in the Chilounge. I also called Mamapop my extended family in my blogher post. I'm thrilled and honored to be a part of it everyday.
    Thanks for the party man. Want to throw my sons Bar Mitzvah? It's 9 years away…that's enough time, right?

  • http://profile.typepad.com/snarkyamber Snarky Amber

    I don't think I thanked you, Catherine, and Amy enough this weekend for everything. Like, not just the amazing gift bag and the personalized necklaces (which I'm wearing pretty much everywhere but the shower, for reals) and the fantastic party with the magnificent sparklecorn cake, but for, like, giving me a place to be a writer. I love you guys.

  • http://daily-della.blogspot.com Della

    Wow. That was LONG! And this is coming from someone who doesn't seem to write a post or comment without it being a novella.
    Also, I do not make a living blogging, nor is that on the horizon in the forseeable future. I'm all excited when I get *A* comment on my blog because it means someone actually read something I wrote. Which is out of the norm.
    Which really makes me feel unqualified to participate in any of the discussions, whether here or elsewhere.
    Having unqualified myself in that regard, I WOULD like to take the time to say that really, people just can't live without Us v. Them.
    And preferably, Us and Those Near To Us and Those We Want To Be But Aren't Yet and Those Who Want To Be Like Us and Those Who Accidentally Copy Us Sometimes and Those Who Will Never Be Us and…
    People, most people out there in the world, have an ingrained need to figure out where they stand in relation to other people. Not necessarily for stratification/value judgements, per se (I'm BETTER THAN so and so), but to figure out how they can and will interact with others. It helps us to function in the world if we have a frame of reference.
    I'm not defending any sort of griping or backbiting or other types of negative feedback that have been used, and honestly I don't even know where I stand on most of the hot-button issues of the day, but I do know people, and I would be willing to bet that ultimately, the majority of the fuss is about getting things settled and figured out, about declaring where folks stand, and not as much about tearing others down as it accidentally appears.

  • http://www.prosaicparadise.com/ Kim

    Hi there,
    I came up to you after the pop culture session and acknowledged our mutual friend Angela, and I just wanted to say Hi! here and thank you for chatting.
    I admit to being increasingly distressed about the money-centric nature of the conference as the thing approached, but what I learned was that a) it's soooo helpful to eat for free for almost all meals and b) it is actually pretty ignorable. I didn't see any celebrities and I didn't get any ads or make any connections to get products to review. And I mean, it wasn't hard to not do all that! I just spoke to people who blog.
    And that part ruled, so, I'm glad I went!

  • KimAZ

    As Roger Clyne, lead singer of my favorite indie band has always said, "Let your art lead the commerce." Yours does.
    Don't sweat it: we the readers will sort the crap from the good stuff.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/ozma ozma

    My favorite sentence.
    "Which, ehh, not to get all Marx/Engels Reader on you or anything, but within a society based in capitalism this is kind of par for the course — the whole social stratifying thing."
    Since I'm one of those crazy people who thinks much that is in the Marx-Engels reader is true, my thought there is REVOLUTION SUCKAS!
    But, uh, bloggers are not the capitalists we are overthrowing. Rather, they are the petit bourgeoisie who must be re-educated. (OK, that's the Mao reader.)
    I kid. I hear you. I wasn't at blog her and I am lucky enough to be one of those people who can totally ignore everything about blogging. Or even forget I have a blog. Also, I like to call my blog 'my website.' (Then, I must remember that my facebook page which is the one where every person I am 'friends' with is a person I actually have not met in person actually seems to be a place where I know people get me in ways I don't feel as confident when I am not posting as a totally imaginary person. OK, that's sad–but I'm just verifying the fact that there is something real about the whole thing, whatever it is. There's something good about it–maybe even good in the way art is good, in spite of its ephemeral nature. Also, there's something evil about it. It contains multitudes.)
    What I really think you should do is just stand up in the coliseum of blogging and say 'ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?' Really, people give you shit and then they are reading what you write? Is there not a contradiction there?
    I don't know what it means to sell out in this context. To write and then get paid for it? That's selling out? That's all kind of bizarre and shit. So Dickens was a sell out for writing for periodicals. I think half the greatest novelist in history were paid by the word, Holmes.
    On the other hand, I do want to put a plug in for the interesting other side of the internet that started way back in the day that was secretive, amateurish and bizarre. But this is STILL THERE. It's not like we are all gazelles grazing on this plain and you big fat bloggers are eating all the grass. THE INTERNET IS INFINITE Y'ALL. There is room for all of us. I mean, readers are 'resources' I guess but they are free autonomous resources. And frankly, the freaky blogger can actually subsist without those resources. So do not covet your neighbor's stats and swag, people.
    Basically, I am saying what you said: Craft, art, integrity can co-exist with the commercial. And even better, there is still an amazing amount of the non-commercial out there. (The internet veldt is hell of vast.) And the 'commercial'–which is what you do–does manage to strike the balance and be risky and original. Also, funny–which is more important. Basically, that shit's real.
    I still want to add the caveat: Capitalism corrupts our souls, in the end. But if this is your business then I think of it like all the businesses I love. If I wanted to be all Marxist and egalitarian on someone's ass I am not going to get mad at the baker who makes bread that is so good it makes me weep for joy. And what the fuck do I care what kind of money the baker makes?
    Also: I can't believe people would give you shit for throwing a party. I mean, what do they think, the Mamapop party was like the Davos Conference?
    Really, that's just weird.

  • http://www.tiedupwithablackvelvetband.blogspot.com/ TUWABVB

    Gosh – I didn't even go to BlogHer this year, but I've read so ma ny recaps nonetheless. I think your post epitomizes what I would feel had I attended. There are always going to be assholes – and you have to make a decision whether you want to associate with such people or not, in real life and on the Internet. I think it's wonderful that some people can make a living from writing on the Internet – I see it as just another form of media, all of which subsists on advertising and sponsor dollars.
    I think your writers are lucky to you have as well! And I hope the chart worked well on the unicorn – I would have hated to see that creature cut up!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/sweetneydotcom Sweetney

    Oh, just to clarify: absolutely no one is giving me/us shit about throwing a party. Like, at all. These matters are just things that have been drifting around in our community lately, and in light of Swaggate at this year's BlogHer, I kind of got to thinking… and thinking, as we all know, is dangerous. :)

  • http://mythoughtsideasandramblings.com Lisa

    Can I hug and maybe kiss you the next time I see? Because seriously, you said exactly what I was thinking. Removing the swag isn't going to remove the people with bad manners — they are still going to be there doing more annoying things. And the point you make about making money not equaling sellout is one that a lot of people need to repeat over and over again.

  • http://www.issascrazyworld.blogspot.com Issa

    I had fun at the party, although I'll be honest, I got overwhelmed and so dam tired because of the day it was on and went to bed before any of the good shit happened. The story of my life. Ha. Kidding.
    I did want to say, the panel you, Catherine and Amy did was one of my favorites of the entire weekend. The conversation was great and I feel like I have a better understanding of where lines need to be drawn where it comes to snark.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/jenncanzo She Likes Purple

    I'm so honored to work for you, you should know. Also, PLEASE LET THERE BE A SPARLKECORN 2010. (Or, if not, let there just a be an opportunity for me to buy you a drink in NYC.)
    Also, let's bookmark this post for the 2010 Community Keynote, mmkay?
    Finally, you're just so right, there's a way to do anything with integrity, whether it be writing or heading a business or just ordering your damn morning coffee. Follow your gut, do what's right and surround yourself with decent people. If you do that, no one will ever be confused what you stand for or whether or not you are being genuine and authentic. They'll know, for sure.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/whithonea Whit

    You're all glitter and gold, baby (your own gold, btw, not gold from sponsors, not that there is anything wrong with that).

  • http://www.chaos4jp.blogspot.com MrsChaos

    Can I tell you something? (I really hope that answer is yes.)
    I'm not a writer…I'm not anything but someone who happens to have a blog as a place to spew out what's on my mind. Though, having a blog has allowed me to connect with some pretty fantastic people. People that help me to see that there are other people that go through similar trials, similar joys, etc.
    I happen to 'visit' blogs that are written by honest to goodness writers. Since I have the choice on the blogs that I read, I choose to read those that I connect with in some way, blogs that are entertaining, and/or blogs of people I know 'in real life'. I have to say that all this craziness surrounding advertising, branding or…swag…it is kinda weird to me. But maybe that's because I'm just a gal with a blog and not really a blogger or writer.
    I'm glad you can make a living doing what you love. It is what you do. I happen to make a living as an accountant. (Gawd, that even LOOKS boring to type.) I hope that people like you will keep writing for the love it. For those of us who love to read what you write.
    (Sorry for the long-winded comment.)

  • http://chaos4jp.blogspot.com MrsChaos

    So…I actually was trying to say something similar to this. Instead I wrote a book. Yeah…sorry about that.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/slouchingmom slouching mom

    i just like your brain. so much.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/slouchingmom slouching mom

    and this from someone who wasn't even AT BlogHer this year.

  • http://darcepedia.wordpress.com Darcey

    Wow, I have to say it was awesome to meet you after the MamaPop ROYO – and the fact you recognized who I was and gave me a hug and we got to chat about the long-lost MPTalk was really cool.
    And the MP party? Was awesome!

  • http://www.missdisgrace.com Miss Grace

    The mamapop party was most faboosh. I feel like I saw you across the room about a thousand times this weekend, but it was always you on the up escalator and me going down, or something, so didn't ever talk really talk to you. Ah well. I can still see you on the internet.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/goonsquadsarah Sarah, Goon Squad Sa

    If you were throwing the party for us it worked. I was totally charmed.
    And if someone crosses me I will tell you first.
    Hopefully you will break their kneecaps for me. I've always wanted that.

  • http://napwarden.blogspot.com Nap Warden

    Hi, I found you through going to your party at Blogher. I had a blast, I love MamaPop, I agree with everything you just said. You have a new fan, now I'm off to follow you on Twitter:)

  • http://profile.typepad.com/mamalogues Dana

    It was the best unbirthday party ever.
    Sankyew.

  • http://fathermuskrat.com muskrat

    Y'all's party was the best of all. Most of us will remember those few hours most fondly of all the events of last weekend and will forget the controversy. Well done. Am very glad to have met, and spent quality time with, the Mama Pop writers who were there!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/ozma ozma

    OK yeah. Well screw those hypothetical people and their hypothetical criticism.
    If perchance, you are tapping into the general mood, it's source is just envy and silliness. Small towns are like this where there's always this grumbling under the surface when anyone makes good. Also, I've heard Sweden is like this.

  • http://fairlyoddmother.blogspot.com Fairly Odd Mother

    MamaPop is one of my favorites and you guys throw an awesome party. It wasn't about the swag or the sponsors or even that amazing cake, it was about being with friends, dancing my ass off and smiling until my face hurt. And, that's exactly how I like to spend my rare nights out. Thanks again.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/thenewgirl the new girl

    This is an awesome post and that was an awesome party.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/shash Shash

    Everytime I read your writings I'm struck on how we think alike in so many ways, and it only makes me love you more.
    I could tell the party was for the MamaPop writers not because of anything more than you put your love into every detail. I was honored to be able to join all of you.
    I hope there is a Sparklecorn 2010. I just have no idea how in the heck you are going to top that cake. Unless you call Aunt Vern to make a 'Groom's Cake'. :) (I kid, I kid!)
    The fact that you twittered a reference to Led Zeppelin makes me want to high-five you. Next year?

  • Amanda

    You said it.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/tastelikecrazy Amy @ Taste Like Cra

    I had a blast at the party. I saw you and I hid because I'm chicken shit but I should have come up and hugged your neck.
    If I go next year, you're getting a hug. Just be ready.

  • http://tmcphoto-peanutbutterpie.blogspot.com/ Tami Murray Cline

    This post hits home on so many levels and not because I am a writer of a blog (which I am) but because it's topic is something that I've grappled with over being an artist. There is a stigma attached to musicians and artists that to succeed in your craft and become hugely popular (read: rich) you will automatically become a sell out. No one wants to be tagged as a sell out, it's not a comfortable label to be given, let alone to have to wear.
    In regards to those that are just there for the swag, those who love what they do and try to do it to the best of their ability stand out regardless of what they are getting and or flogging. Up until recently I was unaware that Heather Armstrong is so well off because of her blogging, Don't get me wrong I knew she was popular and I do read and enjoy her blog posts; I was just ignorant of the whole blogging for money phenomenon (mainly because I am fairly new to blogging myself)
    Thank you for putting into words a feeling that has been with me for a while now
    I may

  • formerly the ginga j

    Man, I remember the shitstorm when Heather put those google ads up. Such a short period and such a long and complex history around all this already. Love this post, love you, and am proud. Also a bit jealous I'm not part of the part-ay any more, but mainly proud and pleased as punch.

  • http://oftheprincessandthepea.blogspot.com Diana

    Excellent post, Tracey. I'm so sorry I didn't get a chance to stop and say hi — you know, contribute to your social overload. ;-)
    Of course we can make money without selling out. We simply have to ask ourselves which avenues of money making are viable without compromising our moral fiber, which are viable without negatively affecting our community.

  • http://www.donmillsdiva.blogspot.com Don Mills Diva

    This was just a fantastic post and I agree completely – this from the girl who wrote post "Show Me The Money Sister" after BlogHer last year and lost readers over it.
    Accepting compensation for writing well is not only acceptable, it's a wonderful opportunity for entrepreneurs to flourish.
    Running over people (literally or figuratively) to get free shit or to shore up your over-inflated vision of yourself as an Internet rock star is just an indiation that someone is lame and lacks manners.
    Thank you for articulating this so well and thanks for throwing the best party at BlogHer (IMHO).

  • http://wherewiller.wordpress.com Emma

    I already read Mamapop like from the beginning, and I love it, but knowing how you feel about your work now (because I didn't know how much you cared about it, that it was your paid work) makes it even more meaningful. Really, really enjoyed the panel discussion too.
    I was glad I was able to tell you in person how great that party was as one of the 450 friends. Great job.

  • http://www.tinymantras.com Tracy (Tiny Mantras)

    Well, this is the most thoughtful post I've seen on this subject. (I wasn't there, but between Twitter and my feed reader, I've certainly been ingesting gobs of opinions about the swag debate.)
    Over the past 17 (gasp!) years, I've written tons of art, music (concert & CD) and book reviews for traditional publications like alt weeklies, daily newspapers, public radio, blah blah blah… and no media outlet that I know of shells out actual money those products for review for integrity's sake, unless you're trying to be timely and it's some huge, important release and there is no way the free thing is going to reach you in time. You get it for free and that's how things are done. I never would have considered reviewing something positively because it was free. Lord knows I would not have gone to Brooks and Dunn or Ashlee Simpson without someone paying for me to do so. (From an anthropological standpoint, those were awesome, though.)
    The best marketers – and I think it's safe to say that the entertainment industry has a lot of good marketing – do understand that ultimately, getting the word out to writers/publications that people read (even if they dump on it) is more important than a glowing review from some hack publication where getting sponsors is obviously more important than being interesting.
    The structure of the Internet, blogs and page rankings might have confused that some for the time being, but I think it will come out in the wash.
    When the blog with integrity pledge came up before BlogHer I thought it seemed like the beginning of a great dialogue. But in the wrap-ups, the conversation so far has come across as a ranty us vs. them thing. I have read about the elbowed baby more times than I can count (I am thankful that no one that I've seen has named this perpetrator, at least, so it's not an all-out witch hunt). But the real issues here are so much more nuanced than an elbowed baby.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/1236288921s15951 Terra (aka Zoeyjane)

    Indeed DanceHer/Boogie Like it's some decade between 1984 and 2007/Sparklecorn was my most favourite of all of BlogHer. It was the only time that I saw everyone loosen up, truly. That people stopped looking nervously at others and just went up and shook their asses next to them.
    Now if I'm getting all comparative, that means that you guys threw a party that was like, the perfect example of what {mom}blogging is about – fostering that community-building with something everyone truly can be a part of.
    I had a wicked time. Overall during the weekend, I wish that I could have spent some one-on-one time with you. Ah well, next year. {ps. The DJ? Loved him. He took my Beasties request right away}

  • http://profile.typepad.com/twobusy TwoBusy

    You threw a party for me! Hoora… oh, wait. I wasn't there. Never mind.
    Integrity killed the unicorns, btw. It's a scientific fact.

  • http://georgienba.blogspot.com georgie

    I didnt go to BlogHer BUt I feel like I just attended a conference after the fact-what a wonderful post! I am so glad i found your blog!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p01157026cb92970c Cheeky Lotus

    1. The early Bloghers were sooo like Star Trek conventions. Spot on.
    2. I don't think Making Money From Something You Love diminishes and taints the thing you love and I too NEED to make a few nickels writing in order to, uh, keep writing.
    3. I disagree with you that the grabbiness and greediness that SOME bloggers overtly displayed does not affect their "integrity" blogging or otherwise.
    Example: I had a blogger come up to me very friendly and I actually felt happy that she was warmer than usual. Five minutes into our conversation she wanted to talk about her sponsor's product. It felt like a gut punch.
    Example #2: I almost got into an altercation over a keychain I had no intention of taking because another blogger wanted it. As I said in my recent post, I purposely didn't look at her badge because I DIDN'T WANT TO KNOW IF I LOVED HER BLOG. I DIDN'T WANT TO KNOW WHO SHE WAS, TRACEY.
    4. Our Mamapop pre-party was my best memory. I adore working with all of you and count myself lucky. Y'all are my swag!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/smilingaimee Aimee Olivo

    I wasn't at BlogHer but have read about a million posts about the swag and the awful behavior around the swag and the thing I keep thinking to myself is that anywhere I have ever been where people are giving away free stuff–well, the people receiving the free stuff just. go. insane.
    I've been the check-in person at events where people took my logo pen thinking it was free for the taking simply because they were at an event. I've been at baseball games where I've seen little kids get practically trampled for a free team baseball cap with an insurance company logo on the back. I've seen grown women in fancy ball gowns who donated thousands of dollars just to be AT the dinner steal the box of two Godiva chocolates from the currently empty seat across the table from them.
    Blogger or not, it is clear to me that people literally go insane for free stuff. Is it too bad that this has tainted the conference? Yes. It is even worse that this seems to be human nature in any context? Hell yes!

  • http://www.greeblemonkey.com Aimee Greeblemonkey

    Great post.

  • http://www.surrenderdorothyblog.com Rita Arens

    Now THAT was worth waiting for.

  • http://humanbeingblog.com lynn

    This post pretty much rinses away the bad taste Blogher left in my mouth.
    I went to the conference to learn to be a better blogger and, unfortunately, I really didn't learn much. I had a lot of fun. A shitload of fun. Even though I got waylaid on the way to the Sparklecorn party (and damn, I was sparkly too!). I was put off by the commercialism of the whole thing, all the shilling and elbowing and grabbing of stuff. I did bring home a bag of swag, and mostly for my kids. And I did tweet about the washer and dryer, because what the hell. And I did give a tip to the Tropicana people (but I didn't mention their juice) in the hopes of pushing a little traffic to my blog.
    I'd love to do what you do, to make a living from blogging. I'm glad you're keeping your values intact while doing it, too. Integrity rules.

  • http://www.thebloggess.com Jenny, bloggess

    I'm way not deep enough to comment on any of the existential stuff you just laid out but I will say that the "unicorn cutting chart" is made of win.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/kdiddy kdiddy

    At some point, when we were at Chi Bar before the party, I tweeted, "Sometimes I notice how amazing my life is. Now is one of those times. Seriously I'm not worthy." I just happened to glance around and saw that I was with a dozen or so of the most fantastic people that I just HAPPENED to bump into online, including you who gracefully LJed into my life SIX YEARS AGO. that fantastic bar with the awesome food and drinks, the fact that I had the opportunity to travel to Chicago for a conference, and the fantastic mood that everyone was in made me tear up. Aside from being miles away from my family, I was exactly where I wanted to be and doing exactly what I wanted to do. And you helped to make that happen.