i've been off the interweb for the past couple of days (attending Internet Anonymous, group therapy...kidding), mainly due to familial obligations and holiday-related crap. for the record, i am *done* with both. i have yet to determine if family gatherings are as stressful as they are now because of the attendant toddler-wrangling involved (M_ gets a titch, umm, high-maintenance during gatherings that exceed 5 or 6 individuals), or if i'm just now coming to terms with how completely screwed up our families are, some intangible veil of self-deception having been lifted from my previously shuttered eyes.
relatedly, M_ received a couple "my first princess" action-figure/playset-type thingys from relatives this weekend during a pre-xmas xmas celebration held at our abode (jamie's folks live in northern VA, which is apparently far away enough that we're no longer obligated to make the trek down there for xmas day festivities, and instead can have a faux xmas with them a week before), and i am deliberating on whether these items are toy-for-tots material or if i'm just going to throw caution and politics to the wind and let M_ sink her chubby, adorable little fingers into the realm of preschool gender-typing. i know some of you may wonder what the hell i'm talking about and why this matters, but until now we've done an excellent -- if not terribly calculated or thought through -- job of keeping our daughter away from toys that promote girls as frillyness-loving, fresh n' pretty, fragile and/or helpless creatures (isn't the whole princess gig about either 1) being transformed in terms of appearance and thereby redeemed (because being pretty and dainty is crucial to a female's value/viability) or 2) being "saved" from danger in some sort of practical sense, usually by a princely male type?). she's pretty much lived a gender-neutral existence up until now -- or at least a gender-balanced one; hello kitty countered with cowboy hats and dinosaurs, etc. in any case, this is uncharted territory, and while my personal inclination is to chuck the whole lot and continue as we have, i'm not so naive that i don't realize that she'll be exposed to such things regardless of my preferences and desires....in all likelihood we'll give em' to her and see what she makes of them, allow her the freedom to decide what's appealing and not, and try very very hard to not influence that process unnecessarily.
in other news of home and hearth, we are now TiVoed, which has the potential to be both the answer to and source of myriad problems. sure, now i can just record the crap i watch and fit the viewing of it in as time permits, but this technology also means i now have the ability to record crap i wouldn't otherwise watch (things that conflict with my own personal version of must-see teevee -- Lost and The Amazing Race, for example)....this has lead to the recording of shows of more questionable merit, like Project Runway and, i'm ashamed to say, Flab to Fab (i'm looking for tips, gawddammit!).
bottomline, we may need to send M_ off to daycare so i have the time to view all the bad tv now at my disposal.
ps: i just TiVoed the movie Home for the Holidays, which was shot in my neighborhood! so its almost like -- through my TiVo usage -- i'm supporting my hood! whoot! (note: john waters also filmed A Dirty Shame in my neighborhood, the plot of which is summarized by IMDB as: "Head injuries and sex-addicts in blue-collar Baltimore." which may give you a sense of just how awesome my neck of the woods is. heh.)